Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 63(4): 385-393, July-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1019354

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction Gigantism is a rare pediatric disease characterized by increased production of growth hormone (GH) before epiphyseal closure, that manifests clinically as tall stature, musculoskeletal abnormalities, and multiple comorbidities. Materials and methods Case series of 6 male patients with gigantism evaluated at the Endocrinology Service of Hospital de San José (Bogotá, Colombia) between 2010 and 2016. Results All patients had macroadenomas and their mean final height was 2.01 m. The mean age at diagnosis was 16 years, and the most common symptoms were headache (66%) and hyperhidrosis (66%). All patients had acral changes, and one had visual impairment secondary to compression of the optic chiasm. All patients underwent surgery, and 5 (83%) required additional therapy for biochemical control, including radiotherapy (n = 4, 66%), somatostatin analogues (n = 5, 83%), cabergoline (n = 3, 50%), and pegvisomant (n = 2, 33%). Three patients (50%) achieved complete biochemical control, while 2 patients showed IGF-1 normalization with pegvisomant. Two patients were genetically related and presented a mutation in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene (pathogenic variant, c.504G>A in exon 4, p.Trp168*), fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of familial isolated pituitary adenoma. Conclusions This is the largest case series of patients with gigantism described to date in Colombia. Transsphenoidal surgery was the first-choice procedure, but additional pharmacological therapy was usually required. Mutations in the AIP gene should be considered in familial cases of GH-producing adenomas.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Young Adult , Pituitary Neoplasms/therapy , Adenoma/therapy , Gigantism/therapy , Pedigree , Pituitary Neoplasms/diagnosis , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/analysis , Growth Hormone/blood , Adenoma/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome , Sex Distribution , Colombia , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/genetics , Gigantism/diagnosis , Mutation/genetics
2.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 51(9): e7427, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951761

ABSTRACT

Genetic and functional aberrations of guanine nucleotide-binding protein, alpha stimulating (GNAS), aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP), and pituitary tumor transforming gene (PTTG) are among the most prominent events in pituitary tumorigenesis. A cohort of Brazilian patients with somatotropinomas (n=41) and non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA, n=21) from a single tertiary-referral center were evaluated for GNAS and AIP mutations and gene expression of AIP and PTTG. Results were compared to the clinical and biological (Ki67 and p53 expression) characteristics of tumors and their response to therapy, if applicable. Genetic analysis revealed that 27% of somatotropinomas and 4.8% of NFPA harbored GNAS mutations (P=0.05). However, no differences were observed in clinical characteristics, tumor extension, response to somatostatin analog therapy, hormonal/surgical remission rates, Ki67 index, and p53 expression between mutated and non-mutated somatotropinomas patients. PTTG overexpression (RQ mean=10.6, min=4.39, max=11.9) and AIP underexpression (RQ mean=0.56, min=0.46-max=0.92) were found in virtually all cases without a statistically significant relationship with clinical and biological tumor features. No patients exhibited somatic or germline pathogenic AIP mutations. In conclusion, mutations in GNAS and abnormal PTTG and AIP expression had no impact on tumor features and treatment outcomes in this cohort. Our data support some previous studies and point to the need for further investigations, probably involving epigenetic and transcriptome analysis, to improve our understanding of pituitary tumor behavior.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Pituitary Neoplasms/genetics , Adenoma/genetics , Germ-Line Mutation/genetics , Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/genetics , Pituitary Gland/pathology , Pituitary Neoplasms/pathology , Brazil , DNA, Neoplasm , Genetic Markers , Adenoma/pathology , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Cohort Studies , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins , Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/pathology , Carcinogenesis
3.
Clinics ; 67(supl.1): 29-32, 2012. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-623127

ABSTRACT

Familial GH-secreting tumors are seen in association with three separate hereditary clinical syndromes: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, Carney complex, and familial isolated pituitary adenomas.


Subject(s)
History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Acromegaly/history , Gigantism/history , Acromegaly/genetics , Gigantism/genetics , Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/genetics , Mutation , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/genetics , Pituitary Neoplasms/genetics , Pituitary Neoplasms/history , Pituitary Neoplasms/pathology
4.
Clinics ; 67(supl.1): 37-41, 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-623129

ABSTRACT

Pituitary adenomas represent a group of functionally diverse neoplasms with relatively high prevalence in the general population. Most occur sporadically, but inherited genetic predisposing factors are increasingly recognized. Familial isolated pituitary adenoma is a recently defined clinical entity, and is characterized by hereditary presentation of pituitary adenomas in the absence of clinical and genetic features of syndromic disease such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Carney complex. Familial isolated pituitary adenoma is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner and accounted for approximately 2-3% of pituitary tumors in some series. Germline mutations in the aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein gene are identified in around 25% of familial isolated pituitary adenoma kindreds. Pituitary adenomas with mutations of the aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein gene are predominantly somatotropinomas and prolactinomas, but non-functioning adenomas, Cushing disease, and thyrotropinoma may also occur. These tumors may present as macroadenomas in young patients and are often relatively difficult to control. Furthermore, recent evidence indicates that aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein gene mutations occur in >10% of patients with sporadic macroadenomas that occur before 30 years of age, and in >20% of children with macroadenomas. Genetic screening for aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein gene mutations is warranted in selected high-risk patients who may benefit from early recognition and follow-up.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adenoma/genetics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/genetics , Pituitary Neoplasms/genetics , Acromegaly/genetics , Genetic Testing , Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/genetics , Pedigree
5.
Clinics ; 65(4): 407-415, 2010. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-546316

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Non-pituitary tumors have been reported in a subset of patients harboring germline mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene. However, no detailed investigations of non-pituitary tumors of AIP-mutated patients have been reported so far. PATIENTS: We examined a MEN1- and p53-negative mother-daughter pair with acromegaly due to somatotropinoma. Subsequently, the mother developed a large virilizing adrenocortical carcinoma and a grade II B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. DESIGN: Mutational analysis was performed by automated sequencing. Loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) analysis was carried out by sequencing and microsatellite analysis. AIP expression was assessed through quantitative PCR (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The functional inactivating mutation c.241C>T (R81X), which blocks the AIP protein from interacting with phosphodiesterase 4A (PDE4A), was identified in the heterozygous state in the leukocyte DNA of both patients. Analyzing the tumoral DNA revealed that the AIP wild-type allele was lost in the daughter's somatotropinoma and the mother's adrenocortical carcinoma. Both tumors displayed low AIP protein expression levels. Low AIP gene expression was confirmed by qPCR in the adrenocortical carcinoma. No evidence of LOH was observed in the DNA sample from the mother's B-cell lymphoma, and this tumor displayed normal AIP immunostaining. CONCLUSIONS: Our study presents the first molecular analysis of non-pituitary tumors in AIP-mutated patients. The finding of AIP inactivation in the adrenocortical tumor suggests that further investigation of the potential role of this recently identified tumor suppressor gene in non-pituitary tumors, mainly in those tumors in which the cAMP and the 11q13 locus are implicated, is likely to be worthwhile.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Acromegaly/genetics , Adenoma/genetics , Adrenocortical Carcinoma/genetics , Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/genetics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Pituitary Neoplasms/genetics , Adenoma , Gene Expression , Germ-Line Mutation , Loss of Heterozygosity/genetics , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Pituitary Neoplasms
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL